White History?Okay, stop me if you’ve heard this one before. “Why do you guys need a ‘Black History Month’? What would you say if we wanted a ‘White History Month’?”

Well, in an interesting twist on this question, The Nation’s Gary Younge ponders a White History Month in which a true racial reconciliation occurs from dealing with the history of racism by whites against non-whites.

For example, consider the following:

(James) Blake was the Montgomery driver who told a row of black passengers: “Y’all better make it light on yourselves and let me have those seats.” Rosa Parks was one of those passengers. She made her stand and kept her seat. The rest, as they say, is history.

There is no month when we get to talk about Blake; no opportunity to learn the fates of J.W. Milam and Roy Bryant, who murdered Emmett Till; no time set aside to keep track of Victoria Price and Ruby Bates, whose false accusations of rape against the Scottsboro Boys sent five innocent young black men to jail.

Wouldn’t everyone — particularly white people — benefit from becoming better acquainted with these histories? What we need, in short, is a White History Month.

The purpose here is not to explore individual guilt — there are therapists for that — but collective responsibility. When it comes to excelling at military conflict, everyone lays claim to their national identity; people will say, “We won World War II.” By contrast, those who say “we” raped black slaves, massacred Indians or excluded Jews from higher education are hard to come by. You cannot, it appears, hold anyone responsible for what their ancestors did that was bad or the privileges they enjoy as a result. Whoever it was, it definitely wasn’t “us.” This is one more version of white flight — a dash from the inconveniences bequeathed by inequality.

An interesting take, to say the least. I wonder if America is up for the challenge.

Popularity: 18% [?]

Sphere: Related Content